When I saw the video on MSNBC Friday of Michael Brown stealing from a store, and shoving the clerk by the throat…and then threatening him with more of it…I had to take a step back. I knew that if I came on here, I would say something I’d regret because I feel that I was played for a chump.
And then I hear on the news yesterday morning that they trashed the convenience store that Michael stole cigars from.
Outrageous. Now the owner of the store has been victimized again. Does he/she deserve that?
I watched Melissa Harris-Perry this morning, and got upset again. I know this is close to home for her, but to deny Michael’s criminal behavior and how that played a roll in what happened is disingenuous. She insisted that people’s rights were being violated by the curfew. Don’t the people who own businesses there also deserve to be protected? They are not saying folks cannot protest at all–they are protesting during the day. With the looting, I feel the curfew is justified. No matter how angry you are, that does not give you the right to steal. Nor is being poor give you a right to steal. I can speak to that because I’m poor and been on food stamps, so I’ve felt the sting of people’s prejudice.
It upsets me…especially because of what happened to me in Fort Wayne. Flashbacks of how I was essentially shunned by the black folk in the building after reporting the harassment of one of the black men. He was evicted. Others came forward after I filed my report–other women….black women–were also intimidated and harassed by him. Some of them just accepted it as “just the way things are” and refused to file a report (probably afraid she would be shunned). Another black lady whom had run the cafeteria reduced cost meal program was intimidated by him so much that she just gave him free food. I suspect that the other black folk came down on her for speaking out–she left not six months after the guy was evicted. The others didn’t care what this guy had done–and that disturbs me to this day.
I now question the validity of Michael’s friend who was with him when he robbed the convenience store…he should have come forward with this information from the start. The fact that he and everyone else kept it hidden speaks volumes.
Do I think the officer was justified in shooting Michael multiple times? Hell no.
We have yet to hear what happened, but if the officer was in fear of his life, that is the only justification. The convenience store video lends credibility to the officer stating that Michael struck him, causing his face to swell. And perhaps he was trying to get the officer’s gun…I’m not as inclined to believe Michael’s friend’s account of what happened.
I’m hoping that in the coming weeks, we get at the truth.