Well, now. Kudos to Sweden for taking the bold step. How about it, United States? *crickets*
Adam Kawalek has had a change of perspective after going to Gaza to tend to the wounded. He believes in Israel having it’s own state, but after witnessing the devastating destruction, he changed his views on their moral authority. Good for him.
I have to admit I was kind of shocked that the New York Observer was printing this story, after the very slanted stories they were printing on Gaza.
The ads are false and offensive. I clicked on the Pamela Geller link…she has a banner across the website of “atlas shrugged”…evidently, she’s a follower of sociopath Ayn Rand. Meh.
Racist and self-absorbed.
So…been thinking about the whole situation in Syria….and I can’t get away from that bad feeling that something is not right.
Last year, the Russians moved warships into the area when we threatened Syria. They are again making statements that we should not mess with Syria.
My gut feeling last year was that if we went into Syria, World War III would break out, bringing Russia and the U.S into war against one another, plus the Middle East.
This year, I am still feeling the same, but now with ISIL, Saudi Arabia is threatened. And they have threatened us, as well. Now they have beheaded a British citizen, guaranteeing that the UK will be involved in any effort against ISIL.
And I don’t know what to say. I hate war, as you all know. But when diplomatic efforts are ignored or even laughed at, what does one do?
I have always maintained that violence is unacceptable–only in cases of self-defense, with someone coming at you with gun, knife, or fist– is that justified. Here we have a group that is killing innocent people whom, to my knowledge, have done nothing against them.
I watched DN! the other day with Medea Benjamin (Code Pink) saying how terrible the U.S. is–and believe me, I’ve read People’s History of the United States, so I know we’re no angels–but when do you say that too many people have died? She did not offer any evidence to the contrary of the innocent people being killed. Would she have the same opinion of Nazi Germany? Should we have left them alone, too? Where is the line drawn?
There is so much more about the Middle East that I don’t know–the history, for one. I’m trying to inform myself, but it is not easy. The Middle East grew out of several of the areas in uproar right now–Syria being one of them. There’s more history there than we Westerners know–blame that on our isolationist education–a comprehensive history not given nearly as much importance as Math, technology, and repeating facts from memory instead of thinking for yourself, via NCLB and Race to the Bottom.
Like I said, there is something nagging at me about this situation–something isn’t right. And I can’t shake that feeling of dread of it escalating into a full scale war with Russia.
If I am reading between the lines correctly, Israel is now seeking to cash in on the destruction it caused to Gaza. My mind is just reeling. Disaster capitalism at the very worst. Holy crap.
Yair Lapid announced a “diplomatic initiative” to increase efforts to “demilitarise Gaza and the transfer of authority in the Gaza Strip to the Palestinian Authority (PA) while maintaining Israel’s strategic security interest.”
He called for Egypt to host a conference to be attended by the US, EU, Russia, Jordan, the PA and the Gulf States that would discuss Gaza reconstruction and establish “economic ties between Israel, the Palestinian Authority and the Arab world.”“The initiative also calls for the involvement of states which will provide economic support for the rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip and the creation of projects which will lead to long term economic cooperation in the region,” the statement from Lapid’s media advisor said –
So…we have a bully that bombs the hell out of a place, destroying homes, schools, hospitals…killing women, children, innocents sitting in a cafe listening to the World Cup…who now wants to greedily make a profit off of rebuilding that which they destroyed.
…are having a back-and-forth about Gaza and the meaning of genocide….
The Observer is somewhat slanted, so it doesn’t surprise me that they will not retract the headline’s sentiments.
This piece is so slanted I nearly fell off my chair reading it….
Rabbi Shmuley chooses to ignore President Carter’s monumental act of getting Egypt and Israel to broker a peace deal…a peace that has lasted decades. And the hostages deal is a cheap shot. They were deliberately held so that Reagan could claim victory…a piece of history that strangely is never reported by the brain-dead media.
Rabbi Shmuley chooses to ignore the interference of food, water, jobs, paychecks, and the ability to earn a living that Israel has imposed on the Palestinians…leaving them little choice. He also ignores Israelis’ own bloody history of killing innocents to gain control of what was once Palestinian land. And he ignores Palestinian wishes for a two-state solution.
Carter states in the video that he does not agree with bad things Hamas has done.