More on San Bernardino False Flag

Here’s another good video examining evidence of yet another false flag.  Note the parking lot of the center:  it’s EMPTY!  I wish I could take credit for noticing it first, but a commenter below the video pointed it out.  It states that the center had been CLOSED.  But as you see a helicopter fly over, there are cars in the parking lot.  WTH?

Something is definitely not adding up here.  The woman witness who states the shooters were white guys of muscular build with military vests on  and assault weapons– was very descriptive —  she goes on with saying that she saw them spray gunfire back and forth.  Now I’m wondering — how on earth did she see all of this from one spot?

She also describes in detail that they had black hat, long sleeve shirts, cargo pants on with pockets and zippers on the side; he had “extra ammo coming ready for something”;  he had six magazines…I mean, really, can it be possible that she had seen so much detail in the frenzied moments of seeing an active shooter??

And a key word here is “extra ammo” and “coming ready for something”.  This is a phrase I have been hearing over and over looking at false flag reports.  It’s also something Obama and the rest have been saying when talking about taking away the public’s 2nd Amendment rights — limiting amounts of purchase.

My instincts are telling me this “witness” is a plant.  Especially if the place has been CLOSED.  We have two very different photos — one with cars in the parking lot, and one where no cars are in sight.   And if the place was closed, then there was no “workplace violence” was there?

The video guy Alex makes a good point about a “fartbook post” supposedly done by the supposed gunman.  Anybody could have posted it.  The CIA could have hacked the account and put anything they wanted up there.

Like I said about my driver’s license photo being distorted — the flash came before the lens clicked, so the camera took the picture as I squinted from the flash, making it look like I was frowning (mad?).  And it added twenty pounds and ten years — this is not normal as I took ID photos for the state.  Those cameras were pretty accurate in capturing the likeness of the subject.  I mean, every camera adds ten pounds, this we know, but the picture from the BMV camera is grossly distorted.  Why?

In addition, I sometimes forget that folks don’t know what I know — Photoshop can alter photos to insert things that were not there.  And as we have seen with the other false flag videos, actors can stand in front of a green screen (which is basically a vivid green painted section on the wall), and the video editor can add any scenery he/she wants in the background.

I saw this with the recent Paris false flag, where they were trying to say that the *cough* reporter was in Paris reporting…but a funny thing happened where it was RAINING and the reporter was dry.  Hmmmm….

And I agree with Alex — the shooting of the SUV looked like an execution.  I cannot tell you how chilling that is…

…and now they are *cough* reporting that the miraculous third person — a neighbor — has been arrested.  Third patsy, you mean?  They are saying he bought the guns for these “radicalized” people…when nobody who knows them will confirm that.  They say they were not radicalized — religious, but not fanatics.

And CNN is trying to say there is not enough government surveillance?  That somehow these folks just got past them?  Are you freaking kidding me??

They are reading your emails. They have access to your bank accounts.  They have access to your medical records.  They can tap your phones.  They can track your internet usage.  They can put cameras in every room in your house.

And CNN is saying they don’t have enough surveillance??

What more can they possibly do to violate Americans’ privacy rights guaranteed them by the Fourth Amendment?

What about the Sixth Amendment — the right to a trial before one’s peers where they have to present evidence against the person?  Where the person has a right to speak?  Where the person has a right to confront their accusers?  Where a person is represented by an attorney?



Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s