So….I’m looking at more Fake Nooz videos, and one of the videos links to the Today Show fake victim of the fake Virginia on-air shooting and someone posts this link to the Military Industrial Complex making it LEGAL for them to air propaganda to the American public. (!!)
The NDAA Legalizes The Use Of Propaganda On The US Public
Michael B Kelley
May 21, 2012, 5:11 PM 116,765 64
The newest version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes an amendment that would legalize the use of propaganda on the American public, reports Michael Hastings of BuzzFeed.
The amendment — proposed by Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) and Adam Smith (D-Wash.) and passed in the House last Friday afternoon — would effectively nullify the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which explicitly forbids information and psychological operations aimed at influencing U.S. public opinion.
Note the date: May 21, 2012
Note who exposed it: Michael Hastings, who died in a fiery crash that many, including myself, believe was no accident. Knowing what I know about cars being remote-controlled, I am almost certain that is what happened to Michael’s car. Also note that his crash was almost a year to the day that he exposed the Military Industrial Complex for…fake nooz.
But to put the blame on Barack Obama is unfair, because George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and probably George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan also were doing it, but we were sooo naive that we didn’t see it. But it’s easier to blame the Black Guy for everything, see? That’s why they want a woman in the White House next…so when this country collapses…they can blame it on That Woman occupying the WH. People have short memories, and don’t see the back too far to all the white guys that occupied that space before that led to the state of the country as it is now. And this is not to put down white guys, but to highlight the tired narrative of white guys with white hats coming to save the day… a la those horrible “Indian” movies that I grew up with…
And I agree with the previous blog’s video on the fake South Carolina shootings and labeling anyone with a gun as a terrorist. It’s quite obvious by now that they are trying to circumvent the 2nd Amendment by getting us to destroy it ourselves. I am truly heartened by those whom have caught this and are waking up. Even those of us, like myself, who want peace and really hate guns have woken up to the evil around us that we cannot control.
Like I’ve said in the forced vaccination posts…the nazis claimed the poison they were injecting into someone was medicine…and now we have Big Pharma paying off legislators to force vaccinations upon people WITH NO EXEMPTIONS. Not even if you are Celiac or have leaky gut, which vaccination is absolutely contradicted with sound medical practice. Not if you are religiously opposed to abortion and aborted fetuses are part of the material in vaccines. We have seen that a woman in the Middle East is going door to door, with armed guards, forcing vaccinations upon children whom she does not know the medical history and she has done it without parental permission.
Related to this–I can absolutely testify to the fact that DHS is about creating scenarios that labeled environmentalists as terrorists, because of the training that I witnessed while working for the Dept. of Health. And by what we’ve seen with the Canadians labeling the Unistoten native tribes as terrorists for wanting clean air, clean water, and clean soil so that they could fish, hunt, and breathe; AND PROTECT their land from Big Energy invasion.
If one is labeled a terrorist, it creates cognitive dissonance because good people don’t want to feel sympathy nor associate with a terrorist. See the psychological play here? Remember the nazis used psychiatry to mess with people’s minds so they were convinced the Jews were the cause of all their problems and if they just get rid of the Jews, everything would be perfect.
Labeling anyone as “against us” (George W. Bush) is creating that psychological dissonance. It’s another play on a passage out of the Bible…but again, twisting the wording around to mean something completely different than its intent. My interpretation of it is that those that are feeding the Dark, like George W. Bush, cannot also feed the Light. As Jesus said, one cannot serve two Masters — one must choose money or God. Big Pharma is about making money off of people’s suffering. God is about healing people, as Jesus, Paul, and others, did.
Without further ado, the 9/11 video:
The moment the “witness” states the towers coming down “due to structural damage because the fire was too intense…” you know right there it was scripted. But again, your mind doesn’t want to accept it because of the horror of that day.
I think it’s important to say that people aren’t saying the towers coming down was fake, but that they came down because of planes crashing into them WAS a false story…as the Architects and Engineers for Truth have been saying from day one:
Note while you’re watching the video, who is telling the truth of that day — witnesses calling into radio stations and DAN RATHER who tell of it appearing to be a demolition and hearing *booms*. There is much made about Dan Rather being fired from CBS because of his putting the story out there about George W. Bush being drunk and AWOL while “serving” stateside during the Vietnam War….methinks he was fired was because he saw and spoke the truth as he saw it on 9/11, which is the bigger fish. George W. Bush doesn’t strike me as someone who gives a rat’s behind what people think of him.
One of the biggest clues is the pancaking of the entire building. As the engineers stated, it would be impossible for the building to collapse equally as it did unless there was no resistance — in other words, the entire support system had to have been severed, which is not possible with one single beam being damaged, as claimed.
Think about molten steel…and how hot those furnaces have to be to melt them. Kathy McGrade, the metallurgist, makes the point that an office fire cannot possibly be hot enough to melt steel…and yet there was molten steel…
…and those investigating it ignored that inconvenient fact.
Which brings me back to what Santilli was getting at in the previous blog on Fake Nooz — why would they have fake nooz? Why put these “crisis actors” on the tube?
As the 9/11 video shows, you can control the message and what gets out to the public by inserting actors with scripts. But Dan Rather, the radio hosts and callers, and others told the truth about explosions and seeing what looked like a controlled demolition.
You can make up your own mind. But it’s hard to step outside the comfort zone of wanting to believe the press is telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth…because if they aren’t telling the truth, that leads to a scary thought of what the hell is going on? Why were the WTC towers targeted?