Hillary Clinton and aides withhold evidence requested by a judge

Elitist Hillary Clinton is once again trying to cover up her unethical behavior by deleting emails that a Judge has demanded to see.  Un-freaking-believable!

The correspondence that has been produced verifies that the State Department itself has not been forthcoming with Judge Sullivan, with Congress, or with anyone else. It allowed Mrs. Clinton to use an off-the-grid system for her entire tenure in the Department, and it kept that startling fact a secret as long as possible. It is simply shocking that the State Department did not immediately inform Congress, the Court, and Judicial Watch that Mrs. Clinton operated solely on a private email server and that the State Department did not have her records. It took months even to discover those crucial facts. And as Judge Emmet G. Sullivan bores toward the truth, more revelations continue to surface.
Read more at http://observer.com/2015/08/breaking-cheryl-mills-to-destroy-emails-about-hillary-clinton/#ixzz3iECtJJdm Follow us: @observer on Twitter | Observer on Facebook Read more at: http://tr.im/z4cbv
—————————–
Be sure to click on the Judicial Watch link.
Ghosts of Dick Cheney...remember those emails he destroyed?  We’re still waiting for him to be indicted for obstruction of justice, destroying evidence, being a war criminal...and on.
———————–
In their letter to Clinton, the Democrats—Reps. John Conyers, Howard Berman, Jerry Nadler, and Bill Delahunt—ask for a search of the archives that Zelikow believes may contain his memo. But the Dems’ letter to the archivist requests more. In that letter, Conyers and the others request the Zelikow memo along with “[c]opies of any ‘documentary materials'” that “mention or refer to” the Zelikow memorandum or “are related to or reflect any effort by an official of the Bush Administration to collect, destroy, or impede the preservation or retention of this memorandum.” In other words, they are looking for evidence of who attempted to bury Zelikow’s opposing view.
[…]
Federal law—including the Presidential Records Act—requires that the White House adhere to strict record-keeping standards. If a White House official tried to disappear an inconvenient memo, he or she might have committed a crime.
————————
What I want to know is….why are Hillary Clinton, Dick Cheney, and any other politician, corporate CEO, or anyone with power is treated as if they are so special that their homes/offices are not raided by the FBI? Why are they given such preferential treatment?   It is clear to anyone with half a brain cell that Clinton is once again up to no good.
Clinton security adviser, Sandy Berger, stole documents from the National Archive to cover up….what?  He should have been thrown in jail for destroying evidence and for treason for not disclosing China’s obtaining designs of U.S. nuclear warheads.  WTH?
——————-
In 1999, Berger was criticized for failing to promptly inform President Clinton of his knowledge that the People’s Republic of China had managed to acquire the designs of a number of U.S. nuclear warheads. Berger was originally briefed of the espionage by the Department of Energy (DOE) in April 1996, but did not inform the president until July 1997.
——————–
And President Obama was out having dinner with  Sandy Berger, among others, last September.    And if you read the wiki entry, you’ll see that even after all of the disclosures, Berger was a member of John Kerry’s election team.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s