Rep. Posey finally drags himself to the podium on Dr. William Thompson and the CDC manipulating data

You know, when I opened this this morning, I was elated…but then my happiness soon died down when the weight of his initial words sunk in:


Youtube here.



AofA’s Adriana Gamondes took the time to prepare this unofficial transcript.

July 29th, 2015 House Morning Hour

Congressman Bill Posey (R-FL) at 1:02:29

Thank you Mr. Speaker. I arrive today on matters of research and scientific integrity. 

To begin with, I am absolutely, resolutely pro-vaccine. Advancements in immunization have saved countless lives and have greatly benefited public health.  That being said, it’s troubling to me that in a recent senate hearing on childhood vaccination, it was never mentioned that our government has paid out over three billion dollars through a vaccine injury compensation program for children who have been injured by vaccinations. Regardless of the subject matter, parents making decisions about their children’s health deserve to have the best information available to them. They should be able to count on federal agencies to tell them the truth.

For these reasons, I bring the following matter to the floor. In August, 2014,  Dr. William Thompson, a senior scientist at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention worked with a whistleblower attorney to provide my office with documents related to a 2004 CDC study that examined the possibility of a relationship between the mumps, measles and rubella vaccines and autism.  In a statement released in August, 2014, Dr. Thompson stated “I regret that my co-authors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the Journal of Pediatrics.” End quote.

Mr. Speaker, I respectfully request the following excerpts from the statement written by Dr. Thompson be entered into record. Now quoting Dr. Thompson:

“My primary job duties while working in the Immunization Safety Branch from 2000 to ’06 were lead or co-lead three major vaccine safety studies—the MADDSP MMR Autism Cases Control study  was being carried out in response to the Wakefield Lancet study that suggested an association between the MMR vaccine and an autism-like health outcome. There were several major concerns among scientists and consumer advocates outside the CDC in the fall of 2000 regarding the execution of the Verstraeten study.

One of the important goals that was determined up front in the spring of ’01 before any of these studies started, was to have all three protocols vetted outside the CDC prior to the start of the analyses so that consumer advocates could not claim that we were presenting analyses that presented our own goals and biases. We hypothesized that if we found statistically significant effects at either 18 or 36 month thresholds, we would conclude that vaccinating children early with MMR could lead to autism-like characteristics or features.  We all met and finalized the study protocol and analysis plan. The goal was to not deviate from the analysis plan to avoid the debacle that occurred with the Verstraeten thimerosal study published in Pediatrics in ’03.  At the September 5th meeting, we discussed in detail how to code race for both the sample and the birth certificate sample.

At the bottom of Table 7 it also shows that for the non-birth certificate sample, the adjusted race effect statistical significance was huge. All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August and September ’02 not to report any race effects for the paper.  Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study.  The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can.  However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper. “

End of quote of the doctor.

Mr. Speaker, I believe it’s our duty to ensure that the documents that Dr. Thompson provided are not ignored. Therefore I will provide them to members of congress and the house committees upon request. Considering the nature of the whistleblower’s documents, as well as the involvement of the CDC, a hearing and a thorough investigation is warranted. So I ask Mr. Speaker, I beg, I implore my colleagues on the appropriations committees to please, please take such action. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, I yield back.

Another doctor speaks out against vaccination…and 21st Century Care Act gives Pharma no accountability

…and the doc has his license threatened.  Thankfully, the board saw no justification for taking his license away.

I’d like to know who the 38 chicken littles who demanded he lose his license are.  Were they paid to wage this nonsense?  Are they the brainwashed sheeple who never question authority?

Quoted in the article:

In Jan 2015, Elizabeth Cohen at CNN covered Wolfson in, Arizona measles exposure worries mom of at-risk kids.   The video interview showed that she has no understanding of the risks associated with vaccination.

Elizabeth Cohen to Dr. Wolfson: “Could you live with yourself if your child got another child sick, I mean really sick.  Had complications, even death?  Could you live with yourself if that happened?” 

(Of course what Cohen doesn’t understand is the fact that there are lots of parents who have to live with the fact that they took their child in for multi-doses of routine vaccinations and they were never the same again.  That possibility doesn’t exist for Cohen.

To her, parents who don’t vaccinate are wrong, selfish and putting everyone else’s child in danger.)


This should make you question anything CNN says.  They are bought and paid for by Big Pharma, along with the rest of mainstream media.  Again…do your own research.  Get opposing views from well-reasoned sources.  It’s your best defense against being brainwashed by the mainstream media.

Cohen tries the guilt tactic.  Very popular tool nowadays.  I wonder if she could live with herself if her child became horribly ill and even died from a vaccine?

Clicking on the newspaper’s link is this important quote:

Thirty-eight people filed formal complaints, and many more called the board to informally voice concern about Wolfson’s anti-vaccine evangelism. However, the board noted, no one has filed any complaints about the Scottsdale cardiologist’s “actual medical care.”


This is really disturbing in that he was being brought before the board…for expressing an opinion.  It was not against his medical care, but that they disagreed with what he was saying.

This combined with the previous post on Valentina Lisitsa…our freedom of speech is being seriously threatened.  We have a right to speak our opinions.

This from the comments section:

Unfortunately … as encouraging it was to read the Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners ruled 4 to 1 that Dr. Jack Wolfson can keep his license after “publicly denouncing vaccines” .. the industry cartel non-the-less succeeded in sending a loud and clear message warning other “doctors thinking of speaking the truth” will face the same unsettling consequences .. the very real possibility of losing their license to practice medicine.

Indeed . if this powerful vaccine cartel continues to grow and become ever more powerful politically .. our “right to free speech” will go down the drain alongside our “right to informed consent” .. as well as our “right to appeal a Vaccine Court decree in State or Federal Courts”

You can rest assured the cartel has taken note of the 4 members who voted in favor of Dr. Wolfson’s “right to free speech”. You can also rest assured the cartel will make every effort to replace these 4 individuals .. using whatever means they deem necessary.

Tyranny .. whether military or medical .. is tyranny none-the-less.

Campbell Brown Plans to Explain Common Core

Mercedes Schneider has an excellent post on Campbell Brown’s hypocrisy…and that of the politicians whose own children do not attend schools with Common Core. That should speak volumes on the true educational value of Common Core. The one-percenter version of do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do…


Campbell Brown is going to help America understand what Common Core really is.

campbell brown 6 Campbell Brown

So she says as part of her July 28, 2015, interview with Jon Ward of Yahoo! Politics:

What we want to do with Common Core is explain it. Just put honesty and truth back into the debate….

I just published a book on the history, development, and promotion of Common Core, Common Core Dilemma: Who Owns Our Schools? (TC Press, June 2015), and I have news for Campbell Brown:

Common Core did not begin in “honesty and truth,” and you cannot “put back” what was not present to begin with.

If Common Core was officially completed in June 2010, why would there be confusion in 2015 over what Common Core actually is?

Simple: Common Core is yet another top-down reform; it started years before it made its 2010 public appearance, and much of the planning…

View original post 1,761 more words

Sockeye face ‘catastrophic’ collapse in South Okanagan

Warrior Publications

A spawning sockeye salmon is seen making its way up the Adams River in Roderick Haig-Brown Provincial Park near Chase, B.C. Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press) A spawning sockeye salmon is seen making its way up the Adams River in Roderick Haig-Brown Provincial Park near Chase, B.C. Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)

Only 18,000 sockeye expected to return to B.C.’s South Okanagan

CBC News, July 28, 2015

A potentially catastrophic collapse of the sockeye salmon run is unfolding on the Columbia River system this year.

Scientists once predicted that about 100,000 sockeye would return to spawning grounds in the rivers and streams in British Columbia’s South Okanagan region.

In fact, it was supposed to be one of the largest sockeye runs in recent history, said Okanagan Nation Alliance fish biologist Richard Bussanich.

View original post 131 more words

RCMP pays out undisclosed amount for “horrifying” treatment of First Nations woman in Saskatchewan

This is utterly disgusting. It was quite obvious she was on her period and needed her underclothes to wear a pad. And not having any water is especially dangerous because a woman loses a lot of water with the beginning of her period. She could have become seriously dehydrated. They wanted to humiliate her in the most egregious way. For one, being Native and for two, being a woman.

Warrior Publications

Ethel Pelly, photo: APTN. Ethel Pelly, photo: APTN.

by Larissa Burnouf, APTN National News, July 28, 2015
YORKTON, SASK — A First Nations woman has won an out-of-court settlement for an undisclosed amount of money against the Yorkton RCMP for mistreatment following her arrest more than three years ago.

Ethel Pelly, 42, was arrested and charged with a drug offence in February 2012 and taken to the Yorkton holding cells.

In an interview with APTN National News, Pelly said that’s where her “horrifying” treatment at the hands of the RCMP began that started with being stripped of her underwear.

View original post 530 more words

‘Quit faking’: Police ignored Native American woman’s pleas for help before she died in jail

Warrior Publications

Image: Sarah Lee Circle Bear ( Image: Sarah Lee Circle Bear (

by David Ferguson, Raw Story, July 28, 2015

The deaths in police custody of women like Sandra Bland and Rekia Boyd have drawn national attention to the potentially lethal threats posed to women of color by racist police.

On Tuesday, Indian Country Today reporter Sarah Sunshine Manning wrote about the July 6 death of a 24-year-old Lakota woman named Sarah Lee Circle Bear of Clairmont, South Dakota.

View original post 262 more words