Emanuel is just another member of “the team” that is trying to undermine public education. (haha, I typed “undermind” at first–perhaps a better term? 🙂
…because, you know, bankers, financiers, business-oriented people who look at kids as products or resources to be exploited. They look at the kids with $$ in their eyes–what can we squeeze out of them? What kind of profit can we make off of them?
From the story:
But Russ Simnick, president of the Indiana Public Charter School Association, said it’s disingenuous to compare charter schools with other schools based on the ISTEP results. For one, such comparisons are between individual charter schools and the overall results of school corporations, in which high and low ISTEP scores are lumped together. Thus, he said, larger corporations have a better ability to mask their lower scores than smaller individual schools. A more honest comparison, he said, would involve lumping all charter schools together and treating them as one school corporation in order to compare with others.
Simnick also disputed Schnellenberger’s statistics on the lowest 50 ISTEP scores; he said only four were charter schools, and all of these opened in 2008. He said it’s not fair to expect such young schools to post high ISTEP scores, especially since many charter schools are in some of the most challenging communities and take in students who just transferred from poorly performing schools.
Unbelievable. What a way to worm out of accountability. The teachers from public schools have made the argument for not giving them a failing grade for the above reasons–children from “challenging communities” are difficult to bring up to speed if they are poor, the parents are not involved, and there is some learning/behavioral difficulty.
But charter schools officials want to claim it’s not their fault that the kids are failing?
This from Pennsylvania. Nepotism? Um, yeah. Nice little game they have going there.
Notice how they use the same lines as the Indiana officials–the kids are poor performers, they’re special needs…blah, blah, blah. If you’ve got only a 15% graduation rate, you’re not the people to be teaching kids. Period.
This from Miami. Taxpayers should not be funding them at all. But that would cut into the profit margin for the education vultures, wouldn’t it?? You know, privatize the profits while socializing the costs, eh?